Hi,
it would be interesting to know technically speaking what is "too outdated" compared to other templates and frameworks like Gavick or Shape 5, do you have examples to give me?
Even if I'm disappointed that Joomlabamboo will not switch to Joomla 4, where I don't understand your team is the fact to not update php, knowing that php 7.4 will stop receiving security updates at the end of November 2022, here we speak about site security, which is an important aspect to ensure for a service which still remains paying.
So my question is: why continue to charge Joomlabamboo if no update has been available for more than a year and no update is planned in the long term?
Maybe you were too optimistic in wanting to take over the management of 3 new template editors or did you know full well that you would never have been able to manage so much work and that only a few of them would have been able to continue the adventure towards Joomla 4? Only you have the answer ...
It is clear that if I switched to Joomlart it's only because I thought that Joomlabamboo would have continued to evolve, I was wrong or else behind this marketing stunt is just the desire to attract a maximum of customers to Joomlart, which is quite legitimate ...
Others editors like Joomdev chose and managed better the stop of Joomla products than Joomlabamboo, knowing that their Astroid framework continues to be developed by Templaza and, last news, their templates and page builder will be maintained by Stackideas, we can say that it is a successful exit from Joomdev, they were conscientious of their customers...