Public Forums 71,145 posts

[jacquelinestarling Friend jacquelinestarlingJoin date: April 2010Posts: 22Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#340112

<em>@penelopeb 171583 wrote:</em><blockquote>Speaking of diversification. My signature just got removed by joomlart I THINK. Was hoping to advertise my site a little while I accumulate enough credit to redeem a JA membership. Now they have all become broken links. That is the reason why diversification is important. Imagine you have 1000 links coming from one site and BOOM, all gone overnight when anything happens. That would hurt a lot. Never put all your eggs in one basket :)</blockquote>

Nah, your signature is still there, but I still agree with the concept. Never put all your eggs in one basket. Spread them out. Some people just use videos, some people just do backlinking to blogs, etc, some people just do RSS strategies, some people just do article writing and submissions. I think you need to do all of the above as well as provide fresh content on your site.

Jackie

[jacquelinestarling Friend jacquelinestarlingJoin date: April 2010Posts: 22Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#340113

<em>@atatum 171656 wrote:</em><blockquote>One of the best things I have found is to write an original piece of software as freeware include your links within it then submit this to all of the software directories gradually.</blockquote>

This is another strategy. There are sites that allow you to build these pieces of software for free within an hour or so quite easily. You can literally do this whole process in 30 minutes. This was a Michelle MacPhearson system she was publishing. I imagine it still works.

[jacquelinestarling Friend jacquelinestarlingJoin date: April 2010Posts: 22Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#340114

<em>@kimkitch 173570 wrote:</em><blockquote>Has anybody tried backlinking to their backlinks. This is supposed to get your profile links indexed quicker by linking to them from sites like Vox, Tumblr, Posterous e.tc.
Has anybody tried this method and if so what sort of results did you get.

Regards

Kim</blockquote>

I always do this. Especially if it is for a lower PR site that may not get crawled often. Also, usually, using a pinging tool which there are a lot of free ones out there will do the trick.

[renzel32 Friend renzel32Join date: February 2010Posts: 3Downloads:0Uploads:0 Thanked: 7 times in 1 posts]

#340411

All members have shared cool tips,those becomes quite helpful to beginners.The more tips wivh I want to add here regarding to backlinks are:
Contextual On-Topic Blogs
Forum Discussion
Search Engine Submission
Image Optimisation
Link Optimisation

[atatum Friend atatumJoin date: March 2010Posts: 3Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#340647

The best way to build back links is write or pay someone to write a good piece of viral software and then use something like robosoft to distribute it to all the main software directories. over time you get 300 -500 links all be them low or no PR to start with, over time they will mature and this will benefit you

[kimkitch Friend kimkitchJoin date: September 2009Posts: 2Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#340693

<em>@atatum 174943 wrote:</em><blockquote>The best way to build back links is write or pay someone to write a good piece of viral software and then use something like robosoft to distribute it to all the main software directories. over time you get 300 -500 links all be them low or no PR to start with, over time they will mature and this will benefit you</blockquote>

This is not a bad strategy but it is not really good enough for anybody who wants quick indexed links. One method that i have used to get good relevant links is to set up a google alert for my keywords and select the blog option. This way as soon as a blog is updated using your keyword you will be notified by google. If you are one of the first 3 to comment on this post then you can get good backlinks and probably a lot of free traffic if the blog is popular.

Regards

Kim

[amilya Friend amilyaJoin date: April 2010Posts: 2Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#340840

The only 2 most important matter about backlinking is DOFOLLOW and ANCHOR TEXT. The rest are only numbers.

[ute738 Friend ute738Join date: April 2010Posts: 1Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#340850

I agree – a link is a link. Relevancy is overated FUD. It is impossible for an SE to determine relevancy, or to even grade relevancy. In fact, acute relvancy is not normal – if my site is in toys, and wherever I go I drop a link to my site, it would be unnatural if I only went to toy sites. What would be naturalis my ging to halth sites, internet sites, marketign asites, etc. and in each, possibly putting my site link as part of my profile. If all of your links are relevant, then it will be unnatural. And who is to say if it is relvant or not. If I am into toys… And I have a link on a CHinese site, or a paint site, it might not seem relvant to toys… except, I may be worried about Chinese toy manufacturers competing with me, or I may be worried about lead levels in the paint used to paint my toys, so suddenly, a chinese site and a paint site ARE relevent to toys. A SE does not have the ability to determine relevancy. Link relevancy is FUD.

[romson Friend romsonJoin date: March 2010Posts: 6Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#341931

<em>@ute738 175205 wrote:</em><blockquote>I agree – a link is a link. Relevancy is overated FUD. It is impossible for an SE to determine relevancy, or to even grade relevancy. In fact, acute relvancy is not normal – if my site is in toys, and wherever I go I drop a link to my site, it would be unnatural if I only went to toy sites. What would be naturalis my ging to halth sites, internet sites, marketign asites, etc. and in each, possibly putting my site link as part of my profile. If all of your links are relevant, then it will be unnatural. And who is to say if it is relvant or not. If I am into toys… And I have a link on a CHinese site, or a paint site, it might not seem relvant to toys… except, I may be worried about Chinese toy manufacturers competing with me, or I may be worried about lead levels in the paint used to paint my toys, so suddenly, a chinese site and a paint site ARE relevent to toys. A SE does not have the ability to determine relevancy. Link relevancy is FUD.</blockquote>

Yes, good one. I heard in the past that it’s all about relevancy or the backlink is practically woth nothing and you will get penalized. This is not true.

For example:

If you write a good article that get lots of traffic and lots of webmasters sharing the link to it on their own site. Then without you doing anything you would be penalized.

Google is aware of this. This would mean that any competitor could get your site penalized by sharing your url on 1000’s unrelated sites.

The best way to get quality backlinks is from authority sites imho. Be it related to your website or not.

[paulg01 Friend paulg01Join date: March 2010Posts: 2Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#342334

<blockquote>The best way to get quality backlinks is from authority sites imho.</blockquote>
I believe ANY backlink from an authority site is very helpful, even a profile page with PR0. You just make sure it gets cached by Google (for example create RSS feeds from the list of your profiles, add them to a blog on a free site and use RSS submitters to submit to every RSS service.

[romson Friend romsonJoin date: March 2010Posts: 6Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#342627

<em>@paulg01 177014 wrote:</em><blockquote>I believe ANY backlink from an authority site is very helpful, even a profile page with PR0. You just make sure it gets cached by Google (for example create RSS feeds from the list of your profiles, add them to a blog on a free site and use RSS submitters to submit to every RSS service.</blockquote>

Thank you very much, i haven’t thought of that before.

[alanbrant8 Friend alanbrant8Join date: April 2010Posts: 2Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#343067

<em>@jacquelinestarling 174276 wrote:</em><blockquote>Well, this is true, but also not true. In the case of a small site that comes out of nowhere, if you go from o to 200 a day, it looks like link creation to Google.

Most Gurus recommend 25 to 30 a day and then maybe in week 2, you move up to 50 a day and then 75-100 and so on.

There are many sites that get 1000s a day, but usually there is a natural growth.

Also, vary your sources ideally. Use many strategies.

Jackie</blockquote>

I see. Thanks for sharing.

[timer1 Friend timer1Join date: May 2010Posts: 1Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#343482

I agree with tommy0!
We should not build it so fast though some automatic software can make it 100/day.
It seem unnatural when you have a very big cloud surrounding you just after 1 night right? Google bot sure will put a question mark on that! So, slow down! And one more thing, make it really helpful thing when you are seeding out there or one day you will destroy our beautiful world with cyber rubbish!

[aladamapee Friend aladamapeeJoin date: May 2010Posts: 10Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#343524

Hey
Thanks for sharing such a useful tips with us….keep updating

[james77grant Friend james77grantJoin date: May 2010Posts: 1Downloads:0Uploads:0]

#345060

Yeah, fantastic thread. Going to read through again… and hopefully post something more constructive. 🙂

[Author]

Posts