Joomla Templates Club 406,261 posts

[k2joom Friend k2joomJoin date: March 2010Posts: 62Downloads:133Uploads:4 Thanks: 7 Thanked: 15 times in 2 posts]

#151469

When Pyro was first released and Installed, running a ?tp=2 revealed and displayed all the correct module positions. I had to do it that way as there was no docs on module positions available.
There is now a module position image now, but it does not display the same modules positions that are actually available in the template. I am left thinking, is the screenshot wrong or have module positions been left in the template.

Anyway, due to the installer error, the file has been upgraded and now the module positions are not displayed correctly.
Check screenshots here
and here.

This is from the very latest release, I have no idea what version we are on, as the version numbers have not been updated which is a bit slack.
In addition the JA Extension Manager is reporting that there is no update available for Pyro, possibly because of the above?

This is purely feedback guys, as this is my first experience with JA and I have to be honest, I am a little disappointed with my experience so far. Specifically, how can a template be released and it not be tested. Installer error is kind a of a fundamental thing that all users need.

Simon
K2 Support
K2Joom

[prakash Friend prakashJoin date: October 2008Posts: 439Downloads:0Uploads:1 Thanks: 2 Thanked: 146 times in 115 posts]

#345345

tp does reveal the module positions correctly. If you see on JA site

http://templates.joomlart.com/ja_pyro/?tp=1

it will clearly show all the module positions.

hence, you could try to delete the template and reinstalling again…maybe the files did not upload correctly or some file may have gone corrupt. hence its suggested to re download and upload the template file again.

[k2joom Friend k2joomJoin date: March 2010Posts: 62Downloads:133Uploads:4 Thanks: 7 Thanked: 15 times in 2 posts]

#345421

OK, so which version is the demo running, as I guess the template that the demo is running has not been updated following the changes to the download files, which is what I already said.
The original worked, but the subsequent 2 updates do not.

[k2joom Friend k2joomJoin date: March 2010Posts: 62Downloads:133Uploads:4 Thanks: 7 Thanked: 15 times in 2 posts]

#345423

Maybe its me, but I just checked that link in FF and Flock and the modules do not render correctly.
Again, here is another screenshot, this time taken from you demo page
Wheres User14 and 15?
Why is there a huge gap after col-mas2 and the bottom section?
Why does the bottom border image not always meet up with the left and right borders.

[uniquebiz Friend uniquebizJoin date: February 2010Posts: 596Downloads:0Uploads:40 Thanks: 33 Thanked: 156 times in 119 posts]

#345438

k2joom;180848Maybe its me, but I just checked that link in FF and Flock and the modules do not render correctly.
Again, here is another screenshot, this time taken from you demo page
Wheres User14 and 15?
Why is there a huge gap after col-mas2 and the bottom section?
Why does the bottom border image not always meet up with the left and right borders.

Dunno about the user 14 & 15 but the huge gap is just the allowed field for the comment showing, found by hovering over the ‘e.’ that shows in the white space the word comment shows. Maybe tp=1 only shows the positions actually active and used?

Cheers Shannon

[congtq Friend congtqJoin date: September 2009Posts: 278Downloads:0Uploads:28 Thanks: 10 Thanked: 49 times in 48 posts]

#346187

Dear k2joom and uniquebiz

JA Pyro is using T3 JA Framework and was defined some positions (user11 -> user16) in templatesja_pyrolayoutsblockscontent-botsl.php. However, in the JA Pyro demo site, they didn’t use yet. So when running with ?tp=1 they are empty.

You can add some modules with these positions (user11 -> user16) to see result.

Thanks.

[Author]

Posts