JoomlArt Forums 32,862 posts

[matjkd Friend matjkdJoin date: April 2008Posts: 52Downloads:0Uploads:0 Thanks: 9 Thanked: 5 times in 1 posts]

#138785

This site is still in progress, but most of the template changes are in place, just waiting on content. It is based on Sanidine, though I’ve altered a fair amount of the css to make it fit the design..

http://92.48.64.140/~sb001

let me know what you think, also let me know if it views wrongly in other browsers!

[TomC Moderator TomCJoin date: October 2014Posts: 14077Downloads:58Uploads:137 Thanks: 948 Thanked: 3155 times in 2495 posts]

#294444

it’s a little difficult to make a full review without all the content there – but I do like the way it’s shaping up. My suggestion is to continue on the path you’re going … get more content in there and bump your thread back up when it’s ready.

Keep up the good work !!!

[sfpkent Friend sfpkentJoin date: October 2008Posts: 829Downloads:0Uploads:100 Thanks: 310 Thanked: 75 times in 1 posts]

#294500

Hi,

Agree with tcraw1010, try finish the website then get our opinion. 🙂

[sunrise Friend sunriseJoin date: February 2007Posts: 920Downloads:0Uploads:5 Thanks: 103 Thanked: 166 times in 114 posts]

#294930

Hi there, It is looking good and you hvae made some nice changes to Sanidine. Like the others said, I’d like to come back when there is more content.

By the way, where are you hosting. Or who else is using 92.48.64.140. I am using WOT.

WOT is a Free Internet Security addon for Firefox and IE that warns you about online scams and risky… and I got a waring that your site, or rather that 92.48.64.140 is risky. You may want to look into it as it gives a bit of a bad image to anyonw visiting your site.

1 user says Thank You to sunrise for this useful post

1. matjkd

[matjkd Friend matjkdJoin date: April 2008Posts: 52Downloads:0Uploads:0 Thanks: 9 Thanked: 5 times in 1 posts]

#294980

I just installed WOT. I run my own hosting company, and all the sites I build are on the same server, I think it might have something to do with just being the ip address, because none of my sites that are attached to a domain name show up as dangerous, such as http://www.redstudiohosting.co.uk, but if I go direct to the ip address it’ll say very poor.
Thanks for the info though

[we2solutions Friend we2solutionsJoin date: September 2014Posts: 526Downloads:0Uploads:21 Thanks: 136 Thanked: 100 times in 1 posts]

#294997

HIi matjkd,

At the moment you make some changes to the template.but try to finished it and go for our opinions.i think menu bar must display well more than is it on now.

thanks

[Author]

Posts