Joomla Templates Club 406,261 posts

[shadoe Friend shadoeJoin date: January 2006Posts: 16Downloads:0Uploads:0 Thanks: 2 Thanked: 1 times in 1 posts]

#138638

Hey!

Awesome template, albeit a small problem, the header is fine, but this client of mine dont want to have the “mesh” in the background of it.. and when I open the sourcefile it’s not removeable. Do you by any chance have a “full” source where I can remove the added mesh? Or can you give me a header without it 😉

I can recreate it but the client is in a rush and I figured, if you have it, then problem is solved 😉

[Phill Moderator PhillJoin date: February 2014Posts: 7013Downloads:40Uploads:77 Thanks: 917 Thanked: 2206 times in 1818 posts]

#293863

What do you meant by “mesh”. When I view the source all I can see is a plain psd file. The grid effect is just photoshop showign that it is transparent and you just dump your own image on top.

[wooohanetworks Friend wooohanetworksJoin date: September 2008Posts: 1239Downloads:0Uploads:2 Thanks: 148 Thanked: 138 times in 41 posts]

#293874

Pardon, may I add something? Sometimes, you wonder why the file contains no layers. The file does, but the layers are grouped and locked. So before moving forward in changing any design attributes, you may check if this is the case and ungroup and unlock any layers of the file.

The Photoshop Help Section will give you access to more information how to do this. You can find this help section when navigating on the upper taskbar.

Hope it helps!

<em>@phill luckhurst 115123 wrote:</em><blockquote>What do you meant by “mesh”. When I view the source all I can see is a plain psd file. The grid effect is just photoshop showign that it is transparent and you just dump your own image on top.</blockquote>

Just some quick note, referring to your wonderful comment on one of my posts in another thread about my english used, maybe it is just me but, are you native english speaking?

I see there a few spelling and grammar incorrectnesses in your comment. So that you may prosper from my reply, I will explain you were (Somehow, people may also spell it this way or use this grammar, but commonly, those following mentions are plain faults):

What do you meant – You can write “What you meant by” or “What did you mean by”, but “What do you meant” is not right. With writing it this way you crisscross the times present and past in an unacceptable way. The word “do” refers to present time and “meant” is past. Also when the variant “What did you mean by” contains present and past, the way how it is set together is important, “did you mean” is acceptable and when comparing both acceptable variations, “What you meant by” is simply an easy form, where indeed some language specialists may argue about if this is correct British English. However, in the American region, the term “What you meant” may be widely accepted without doubts about it’s correctness.

The word showing is not spelled showign. A simple fault, may be a keyboard typing issue.:)

You also missed on setting some commata, but this should be part of another lesson, to learn more about how to avoid the prior faults, should be more important…;)

Hope it helps and good luck in the future!

[Phill Moderator PhillJoin date: February 2014Posts: 7013Downloads:40Uploads:77 Thanks: 917 Thanked: 2206 times in 1818 posts]

#293881

Both are in fact a typing faults due to trying to type on a mobile phone from a bar in Venezuela. Having extremely slow Internet does not lend itself to correcting minor typos.

In my previous post, I was not attempting to insult you but to merely comment that at times I struggled to follow your style of writing. I may have not written in the grammatically correct form of English but at least it is understandable where some of your threads I struggle with.

I am a slow learner as it has taken me a while to realise that you are obviously an insecure troll who delights in his childish attempts at wit.

I’m beginning to think you’re actually one of us winding the other up, seriously no real person this side of an asylum would publicly humiliate himself so often by parading his ignorance and bad grammar to a pseudo intellectual group such as ours.

But in any event on the very slim chance that burnt out drug abused grey matter lurks somewhere behind a crumb filled keyboard with a spittle coated screen somewhere on the Eastern Coast of the place our retarded colonial forefathers went off to inbreed, I will respond thus..

I’m also fairly sure others would agree with me that anything you thought or had to say about us would be regarded with not even the fraction of concern that we might have for a child with Mute Tourettes syndrome in a self help art group as viewed below, carrying funnily enough a message aimed directly at you.

[ShannonN Friend ShannonNJoin date: July 2006Posts: 1947Downloads:0Uploads:9 Thanks: 16 Thanked: 172 times in 49 posts]

#293891

phill luckhurst;115149Both are in fact a typing faults due to trying to type on a mobile phone from a bar in Venezuela. Having extremely slow Internet does not lend itself to correcting minor typos.

In my previous post, I was not attempting to insult you but to merely comment that at times I struggled to follow your style of writing. I may have not written in the grammatically correct form of English but at least it is understandable where some of your threads I struggle with.

I am a slow learner as it has taken me a while to realise that you are obviously an insecure troll who delights in his childish attempts at wit.

I’m beginning to think you’re actually one of us winding the other up, seriously no real person this side of an asylum would publicly humiliate himself so often by parading his ignorance and bad grammar to a pseudo intellectual group such as ours.

But in any event on the very slim chance that burnt out drug abused grey matter lurks somewhere behind a crumb filled keyboard with a spittle coated screen somewhere on the Eastern Coast of the place our retarded colonial forefathers went off to inbreed, I will respond thus..

I’m also fairly sure others would agree with me that anything you thought or had to say about us would be regarded with not even the fraction of concern that we might have for a child with Mute Tourettes syndrome in a self help art group as viewed below, carrying funnily enough a message aimed directly at you.

hang on, i’ll just pull up a chair and get the popcorn 😀

[shadoe Friend shadoeJoin date: January 2006Posts: 16Downloads:0Uploads:0 Thanks: 2 Thanked: 1 times in 1 posts]

#293898

@phill luckhurst
Of course. But it would’ve been better if the sourcefiles where all layered so you can work with the whole layout without “dumping my own on top.”

@wooohanetworks
Great tip. I will check that immediately.

— Eh.. why are we kicking people for spelling badly? Not all people here are naturally speaking english (I’m not for one) so give that up.

[scotty Friend scottyJoin date: March 2008Posts: 2339Downloads:0Uploads:13 Thanks: 76 Thanked: 827 times in 595 posts]

#299338

@phill luckhurst
Of course. But it would’ve been better if the sourcefiles where all layered so you can work with the whole layout without “dumping my own on top.”

The source files are layered and the mesh (the layer called ‘pattern’ in the logo group) is removable.

wooohanetworks;115140I see there a few spelling and grammar incorrectnesses in your comment. So that you may prosper from my reply, I will explain you were (Somehow, people may also spell it this way or use this grammar, but commonly, those following mentions are plain faults):

lol @ you correcting someone elses use of English!

In your attempts to ‘teach’ people English you may wish to first make sure that your own is correct.”I see there a few spelling…” – should be – “I see there are a few spelling…”
“I will explain you were…” – should be – “I will explain to you where…”
These of course could be perfectly innocent typos. Or they could be a bad web translator. Or they could even be that your own English is not perfect.

BUT WHO CARES!!! Everyone knows what you meant – just as thay neu wat Phil ment.

lol @ the photo!

[ahmedhn Friend ahmedhnJoin date: December 2008Posts: 75Downloads:0Uploads:12 Thanks: 16]

#303390

So, is it possible to get the full layers just like the other templates? if so, how? i dont think it is a matter of ungrouping or unmerging.

[Author]

Posts